learning from experience
The Supreme Court’s order dated 15 October 2026 examines internet access as a fundamental right alongside child online safety, CSEAM detection and removal, intermediary accountability, reporting duties and grievance mechanisms.
The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging the Bombay High Court’s decision setting aside the ₹8,415 crore write-down of Yes Bank’s AT-1 bonds. The judgment examines the Reconstruction Scheme, the Administrator’s statutory authority and the RBI’s regulatory powers.
Can a Victim Approach the High Court for a Speedy Trial? Can a victim or complainant independently approach the High Court when a criminal trial continues to face delays? Or is the right to seek expeditious disposal available only to the accused or the State? In Renuka Jain v. The
Supreme Court Holds That Permanent Status Cannot Be Ignored to Deny Annual Increment The Supreme Court has clarified the entitlement to annual increment after regularisation in Chhaganbhai Kohyabhai Pateliya & Ors. v. The State of Gujarat & Ors., 2026 INSC 1088, decided on 6 October 2026. The judgment concerns retired
The Supreme Court in Sanofi India Ltd. v. Central Bureau of Investigation, 2026 INSC 957, examined how mens rea can be attributed to a corporation and whether criminal proceedings against a company can be quashed merely because no natural person has been identified or arraigned.
The Supreme Court in Mulla Afroz v. Union of India, 2026 INSC 1067, examines whether a police confession can independently sustain preventive detention under the National Security Act, along with the constitutional safeguards governing personal liberty.
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Jai Bir Singh 2026 INSC 897 | Civil Appeal No. 897 of 2002 & Connected Matters | Supreme Court of India | Nine-Judge Constitution Bench | 20 August 2026 Why should you read this judgment? What exactly amounts to an “industry” under Indian labour law?
The Supreme Court examines illegal arrest, Article 22 safeguards, re-arrest and judicial oversight in Jaskaran Jeet Singh Deol v. State of Punjab, 2026 INSC 1022.
NWDA CWC pay parity was the central issue before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, in OA No. 1747/2015, O P Singh Kushwah & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr. The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has allowed OA No. 1747/2015, O P
Hari Dutta Sharma v. State of U.P., 2026 INSC 998 The Supreme Court on vehicle repossession was examined in Hari Dutta Sharma v. State of U.P. & Ors., 2026 INSC 998, where the Court considered the manner in which a financier may exercise its contractual right to repossess a vehicle
Please read the following information before accessing this website.
The Rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit advocates and law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on "Proceed to Website", you acknowledge and confirm that:
CJI shall not be liable for reliance on this information. Users are advised to seek independent legal counsel before acting.
