learning from experience
Filing FIR and Abetment of Suicide is an issue that the Supreme Court recently examined in the context of matrimonial disputes and allegations under Sections 107 and 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The Supreme Court has clarified that filing an FIR or initiating legal proceedings does not, by
The Delhi High Court, in N.D.M.C. v. Yogendra Kumar Berry, W.P.(C) 12686/2006, decided on 18 August 2026, examined Labour Court interference with domestic enquiry findings in a disciplinary proceeding concerning an employee of the New Delhi Municipal Council (N.D.M.C.). The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Mahajan, examines the
The Supreme Court in Bhumika Trust v. Union of India has modified the framework governing the practice requirement for recruitment to Civil Judge (Junior Division) posts, introducing a transitional arrangement followed by a structured training and clerkship model.
GST on Advocates Acting as Insolvency Professionals was examined by the Delhi High Court in Kanwal Chaudhary v. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India & Ors., where the Court clarified the applicable GST mechanism for services rendered by an Advocate in the capacity of an Insolvency Professional. In Kanwal Chaudhary
The Supreme Court has dismissed the Special Leave Petition filed against the Delhi High Court judgment in the CGHS Regularization Case. This article explains the latest judicial development, the litigation history, and the legal significance of the order dated 31 July 2026.
दरभंगा के ऐतिहासिक गंगासागर, दिग्घी एवं हराही पोखरों के संरक्षण से जुड़े मामले में सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने महत्वपूर्ण निर्देश जारी किए। न्यायालय ने बिहार सरकार से आश्वासन मांगा तथा जलाशयों के संरक्षण पर जोर दिया।
दरभंगा जिला प्रशासन ने ऐतिहासिक गंगासागर एवं दिग्घी पोखर से अतिक्रमण हटाने का अभियान प्रारम्भ कर दिया है। यह कार्रवाई राष्ट्रीय हरित अधिकरण (NGT) के समक्ष लंबित पर्यावरणीय मामले के क्रम में एक महत्वपूर्ण प्रशासनिक कदम मानी जा रही है।
The Gujarat High Court’s landmark judgment in the 2008 Ahmedabad Serial Blast Case examines criminal conspiracy, forensic evidence, electronic records, and important principles governing criminal trials and appellate review. This article explains the legal significance of the decision in a clear and educational manner.
The Delhi High Court clarified that a street vendor holding a valid Certificate of Vending cannot be unnecessarily disturbed while carrying on mobile vending, provided the vendor complies with the conditions of the Certificate of Vending and does not vend in a designated No-Vending Zone.
The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Pooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd. establishes a zero-tolerance approach towards AI-generated fake judicial precedents and reinforces the responsibility of advocates and courts to verify legal authorities before relying on them.
